Is this a safe space? I hope it is because, as a longtime former MCU fan, I have to sit down and admit that, deep down, I never really thought Tom Holland had that Spidey it quality. Wait. Put the pitchforks down. Let me rephrase that. I always thought the writers were doing a pretty bad job with Spider-Man in the MCU. There. It was never really about Tom (maybe a little).
But in all fairness, my teenage self got deeply invested in Andrew Garfield’s Spider-Man. Not just because of all the teenage-girl feelings he stirred in me, but because, out of all of them, I always felt like he was the only one who actually got it. In fact, I’m going to talk about the latest Spider-Man installment, Brand New Day, and praise the hell out of it, but I’ll also say that I think they’re still trying to capture that quick-witted, fast-talking version of Spider-Man, and it still doesn’t quite work. I think Andrew was the only one who ever truly nailed it.
But we’ve moved past the other Spider-Men. This is Tom Holland’s era, and he absolutely deserves it.
So, shall we dig into the roots of what makes everyone’s favorite friendly neighbor so beloved? At least from my point of view.
There’s something about Spider-Man that, even as we find ourselves in the middle of superhero fatigue and an oversaturated genre, still manages to fill theaters. Spider-Man: Brand New Day has even managed to surpass what I would consider the MCU’s most ambitious, and perhaps most self-important entry in its long-running saga, the culmination of everything that came before it, Avengers: Endgame.
We always find ourselves rooting for the hero who comes from the bottom. The kid.
Spider-Man first appeared in Marvel comics in 1962. Part of what made him so distinctive among young readers at the time was that, unlike teenage characters such as Robin in Batman, Peter wasn’t relegated to being the sidekick of an adult hero. He was a full-fledged hero in his own right, even if he still lived with his aunt and uncle, even if he was socially awkward and not particularly popular. He was the perfect vessel for any kid who felt a little uncomfortable in their own skin to pour a little bit of themselves into and see themselves reflected back.
And this is where I start getting into some of the mistakes MCU’s different writers made when it came to characterizing him. Spider-Man doesn’t even enter this cinematic universe with a movie of his own, but as a supporting character of an adult hero in a war that was already brewing: Civil War.
The superhero whose story had once foregrounded the struggles of adolescence, the financial worries of a working-class life, and the moral responsibility that came with his powers ends up becoming the… apprentice? Because it’s not like Peter was ever actually Tony Stark’s apprentice, but we could say that, when it comes to the whole superhero business, Stark is the one who takes him under his wing and brings him to the next level (dust.)
Peter Parker isn’t driven to do good on some massive scale, stopping alien invasions or preventing apocalypses. What really fuels people’s love for Spider-Man is how grounded he feels. He deals with the problems that affect ordinary people in their everyday lives because these are his neighbors, because Peter is one of them. And he doesn’t have to do any of it, but the responsibility that comes with great power, his guilt over his uncle's death and not doing more about it, and his own principles push him to act, turning him into one of our favorite vigilantes.
Holland’s first three movies in the MCU lost some of that sense of the city, that great character in Spider-Man’s life, and decided to revolve around something bigger instead. In them, Peter is deeply influenced by Tony, whom he clearly looks up to, while his own world shrinks down to his school, his classmates, and a handful of recurring characters (Ned, MJ, Flash), often used for laughs. I’d even argue that these characters don’t do much beyond fulfilling a function within Peter’s life as a student, yet we know surprisingly little about them. In this universe, Peter has his Aunt May and still we know very little about the life they share. There's no weight over losing his parents or his uncle Ben. He goes to a good school, has a promising future ahead of him, has access to Tony Stark and resources no other movie version of Peter Parker could have ever dreamed of, and money rarely seems to be much of an issue.
A movie’s personality lives in the details, too. It feels strange to watch Spider-Man without seeing him swinging between New York buildings, getting his picture taken, living in Queens with all the problems that come with being young. Some of those things get lost when you try to fit the web-slinger into a universe already built around other heroes and, more importantly, other problems. The political conflict between Iron Man and Captain America. Thanos invading. Half of all life in the universe being wiped out. The friendly neighborhood hero starts to feel pretty small and almost unnecessary with so much happening around him. Unlike other Spider-Man movies, these films struggle with that competition of scale when it comes to building their own conflicts and villains.
Spider-Man: Homecoming, Spider-Man: Far From Home, and Spider-Man: No Way Home (how did we let them get away with those names?) have their ups and downs. I think going to see a Marvel movie (when you’re caught up with everything that’s going on) is an experience in and of itself. Personally, I always had a lot of fun with them, but you could gradually see the quality slipping and, at a certain point, the whole thing started to feel exhausting. Far From Home had its moments, but I’d probably consider it the worst of the three, while one of the biggest reasons No Way Home became so ingrained in our collective memory was the reactions we all had in the theater when we got to see all those actors again. (Andrew Garfield, you liar!)
No comments:
Post a Comment